Customize your website

  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (7)

Saskatchewan gov't passes motion supporting nuclear development

Published on April 2, 2009
Published on July 10, 2009
The Canadian Press ~ The News  RSS Feed
Topics :
Saskatchewan Party , TSX , Uranium Development Partnership , Saskatchewan , REGINA , Lloydminster

THE CANADIAN PRESS

REGINA - The Saskatchewan legislature has passed a motion supporting the development of nuclear power, just one day before a report is to be made public on how the province should foster its uranium industry.

The motion, passed Thursday with the support of the governing Saskatchewan Party and the Opposition New Democrats, calls on the legislative assembly to back "consideration of further value-added development of Saskatchewan's uranium industry including nuclear power generation."

Enterprise and Innovation Minister Lyle Stewart said earlier there are no guarantees that a nuclear power plant will be built in Saskatchewan.

"It's a 50-50 proposition in my mind," he said. "I think that we need to do something to provide baseload power that's either free of GHGs (greenhouse gas emissions) or a low emitter of GHGs, and there aren't many options."

Saskatchewan is the world's largest producer of uranium - the key component in nuclear power generation. But mining the raw material is as far as the province has progressed in the nuclear cycle.

Premier Brad Wall has repeatedly suggested that Saskatchewan would like to branch into everything from uranium enrichment to medical research and the development of small reactor technology.

Last year, the government appointed a 12-member panel to advise the province on how to develop its uranium and nuclear industry. The Uranium Development Partnership, which studied the nuclear cycle from mining through to disposal, submitted its final report to Stewart this week. It is to be made public Friday.

The $3-million, government-commissioned report on nuclear energy options follows a feasibility study released at the end of November by Bruce Power (TSX:CCO, TSX:TRP).

That study identified a region from Prince Albert west to Lloydminster as a good spot to build. It suggested a plant could be in operation by 2018 and contribute 1,000 megawatts of electricity to Saskatchewan's generation mix by 2020.

Both studies had the Opposition New Democrats up in arms Thursday.

The New Democrats supported the motion because it called for the "consideration" of value-added development, something it said is important to Saskatchewan people.

But NDP Leader Lorne Calvert said he is still concerned about information being provided to the public.

Comments

  • Username
    Jeff
    - September 18, 2009 at 13:55:11

    I agree with Aric, they should build the nuclear plant and put it in Saskatoon. They should also haul all of the waste from the future development of the tar sands and make a bunch of toxic ponds in and around Saskatoon for his and his family's enjoyment. And when the tar sands drain our water supply ( like what's happening in Alberta)and cause strange new cancers for everyone who lives near them we can just say Oops! Then we can start using renewable energy, when it's too late

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Aric
    - September 18, 2009 at 13:39:51

    Great plan Jeff! We can use renewables like wind, and when the wind isn't blowing fast enough, or is erratic, we can either import power at a huge cost and go in the dark. Solar? Not feasible. Hydro...well we should be using more but we don't have much more capacity. Renewables sound terrific, but just are not feasible at all. If you could come up with a solid plan and not just general ideas, I would be open to the plan. And I thought we were talking about nuclear, not the oil sands. You probably use oil from the oil sands in your car, so again, that's hypocritical. Do you use plastics at all during a typical day? Again, made from oil. As for nuclear storage, put it right back where it came from.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    b
    - September 18, 2009 at 13:35:23

    We should sure value add our sales on uranium whether it involves power plants i am not sure. As for wind and solar they are unreliable but they are 100% clean and that should be our only $$ contribution to the kyoto accord and carbon credit mystery

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Kevin
    - September 18, 2009 at 13:09:33

    It is hard to believe that they are so quick to develop nuclear energy when this province has so much wind and sun that can be easily be used

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Aric
    - September 18, 2009 at 13:04:56

    We have not been so quick to develop nuclear. We are 40 years behind. Solar is crazy expensive, and wind cannot be used for baseload. The wind turbines we have drive the Grid Control Center operators nuts at SaskPower. I know it always seems windy but it's not. Coal is super dirty...we don't have many options. We are hypocritical to say mining is ok but the plants are bad. And mining it but not using it would be like Saudi Arabia having oil wells but not alowing cars to run on gas because gas pollutes. We should be taking our resources to their fullest cycle, even waste storage

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    GetaGrip
    - September 18, 2009 at 12:58:33

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CANDU

    Take a look at a nice reactor it can recycle .... like the the stuff stored in silos all over the US in various yields of weapons grade Plutonium. C'mon you guys if Moose Jaw can build a multiplex surely Saskatchewan can go Nuclear.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Aric
    - September 18, 2009 at 12:49:13

    Ok even though I was snarky and sarcastic as well, having a grown up discussion on this issue is what we need. Putting the plant and waste storage and toxic tar ponds in Saskatoon? Come on? This isn't very helpful.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Moose Jaw Times Herald is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Expert bloggers

Warriors Notebook
Blogger
Matthew Gourlie
Warriors notebook

More bloggers here

Advertising