• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (1)
  •  

Negotiations authorized for the city to acquire High Street property

The owners of this building on High Street West have offered the property to the City of Moose Jaw with stipulations on how it could be developed. Aaron Stuckel

The owners of this building on High Street West have offered the property to the City of Moose Jaw with stipulations on how it could be developed.

Published on September 18, 2012
Published on September 18, 2012
Lisa Goudy  RSS Feed

Latest News

See All Articles

Topics :
Times-Herald , High Street , Moose Jaw

The city is authorized to negotiate to acquire one property and explore the possibility of acquiring another.

During Monday’s regular council meeting, Coun. Fraser Tolmie moved an amendment to his motion to acquire the property at 105 High St. W. Instead of administration reporting back to city council with a recommendation of a source of funding for the demolition and removal of the building, administration would report back to executive committee. The majority of council voted in favour of Tolmie’s amendment.

Similarly, Coun. Terry Coleman brought forward a motion to explore the possibility of acquiring the property at 122 First Ave. N.W. Most of council voted in favour of Coleman’s motion.

“I don’t know how many times that I’ve been approached by the citizens of Moose Jaw asking, ‘What was the city thinking, leaving those buildings there like that?’” said Tolmie. “This motion is a way forward to see if there can be an agreement made between the city and the land owners regarding this property.”

The owners, Robert and Monique Marciszyn, stated in a letter they are prepared to give the city the first right of refusal to obtain the property subject to several conditions. The property would be a donation to the city in exchange for a tax receipt for the value of the land. The city would also develop green space to improve the appearance of the land surrounding Mosaic Place.

However, there were mixed feelings among city council regarding Tolmie’s amended motion and Coleman’s motion.

“I think it’s pretty clear if you listen to the community that there needs to be development in the downtown area, but as I raise the question about the background report to this motion, there’s not context for a plan for the area,” said Coun. Don Mitchell. “For the city to purchase land without any sense of related developments and intent is obviously premature.”

For more information, see an upcoming edition of the Times-Herald.

Comments

  • Username
    B
    - September 18, 2012 at 18:51:21

    No surprise here, Millions more for a few more parking spaces, No green space please, high maintenance.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Between the Lines
Blogger
Katie Brickman
The Moose Jaw Times-Herald
Blades bow out of Memorial Cup
Designer Confessions
Blogger
Jillian Bilawchuk
Understanding Scale and Balance

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising